Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3362688
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T03:18:16+00:00 2026-05-18T03:18:16+00:00

If I do something like the following: ifstream file; file.open(somefile, ios::binary); unsigned int data;

  • 0

If I do something like the following:

ifstream file;
file.open("somefile", ios::binary);

unsigned int data;

file >> data;

My stream will always set the failbit and the data will remain uninitialized. However, if I read a char or unsigned char instead, the stream is fine. perror() is telling me “result too large”.

The only thing I saw on Google was a suggestion saying that operator>> shouldn’t be used for binary data (prefer read()), but I find the operator to be cleaner and easier to use — and it doesn’t require casting everything.

Can someone explain this issue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T03:18:17+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 3:18 am

    The iostream extraction operator (>>) attempts to interpret numerical strings separated by whitespace, not binary data. There are many different ways to encode an unsigned integer in binary form (e.g. a 32-bit 2’s complement representation in little-endian byte order). That’s why you must use the read/write functions to operate on such binary buffers.

    However, nothing prevents you from implementing your own class for serializing binary data in whatever form you wish using the insertion and extraction operators. Such a class would likely use the read function of an ifstream object internally. Alternatively, the boost serialization library may already hold exactly what you want.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Why something like following is not allowed. I mean why the following method will
I have something like the following data structure: Category StartDateTime EndDateTime =============================================== 1 12/1/2009
I want something like the following: foo.should_receive(:bar).with(an_instance_of(Bla))..... Is this possible? Edit: According to the
I want something like the following but would like it to be reusable for
I'm doing something like the following: Validate number of nested attributes . I'm checking
Suppose I have something like the following in test.cxx (and that I do the
I'm attempting something like the following: switch ($p) { foreach ($modules as $m) {
Is there something like the following in Apache Common Lang or Spring Utils or
So I have something like the following in Java: private List<SomeType>variable; // ....variable is
I have something like the following code: template<typename T1, typename T2, typename T3, typename

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.