Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8945107
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T12:10:34+00:00 2026-06-15T12:10:34+00:00

If I had a method with no operation but to return the passed in

  • 0

If I had a method with no operation but to return the passed in parameter would the compiler remove it from the generated MSIL?

For example:

public partial class StringResource {

    /// <summary>About</summary>
    public static string About { get { return Encode(Resources.WebUI.About); } }

    public static string Encode(string s) { return s; }
}

Would the C# compiler even generate the Encode method? How can I look at the generated IL and compare the code with and without the Encode method?

And if the static compiler does not remove it what about the runtime JIT compiler?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T12:10:35+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 12:10 pm

    If I had a method with no operation but to return the passed in parameter would the compiler remove it from the generated MSIL?

    No. It couldn’t be – that would break anything which tried to call that method via reflection, etc.

    The method could potentially be inlined to nothing by the JIT, but that’s a different matter. There are various things which determined whether methods can be inlined, and those details differ between different versions of the CLR, different process architectures etc. For empty methods, I’d expect them to be inlined (when not running in a debugger) for non-virtual calls.

    How can I look at the generated IL and compare the code with and without the Encode method?

    1. Compile the code.
    2. Disassemble, e.g. with `ildasm Foo.dll /out=before.il
    3. Change the code
    4. Compile
    5. Disassemble, e.g. with ildasm Foo.dll /out=after.il
    6. Compare before.il and after.il
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Initially I had a method in our DL that would take in the object
I saw a Java example that had a main method labeled as synchronized, calling
Had to download Command Line Tools from Apple to get make to work, but
I had a method with the following line @noticias = Noticia.where(:tags.all => array).paginate(:page =>
I got a problem today. It had a method and I need to find
Had a problem with the recursive conflictCheck() method. That seems fine now. I have
I've had problems with the update method in subsonic, so instead of using: a.Update()
A question was raised in a discussion I had around whether an interface method
It was working few days ago, don't know what had went wrong... **undefined method
I really wish Processing had push and pop methods for working with Arrays, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.