If I had an array of signed integers e.g:
Array
(
[0] => -3
[1] => 1
[2] => 2
[3] => 3
[4] => 3
)
To get unique values I would instinctively use array_unique but after consideration I could perform array_flip twice which would have the same effect, and I think it would be quicker?
array_unique O(n log n) because of the sort operation it uses
array_flip O(n)
Am I correct in my assumptions?
UPDATE / EXAMPLE:
$intArray1 = array(-4,1,2,3);
print_r($intArray1);
$intArray1 = array_flip($intArray1);
print_r($intArray1);
$intArray1 = array_flip($intArray1);
print_r($intArray1);
Array
(
[0] => -3
[1] => 1
[2] => 2
[3] => 3
[4] => 3
)
Array
(
[-3] => 0
[1] => 1
[2] => 2
[3] => 4
)
Array
(
[0] => -3
[1] => 1
[2] => 2
[4] => 3
)
I benchmarked it for you: CodePad
Your intuition on this was correct!
Output:
Note that
array_keys(array_flip($array))will give a new key values in order, which in many cases may be what you want (identical except much faster toarray_values(array_unique($array))), whereasarray_flip(array_flip($array))is identical (except much faster) toarray_unique($array)where the keys remain the same.