Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8729165
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T08:47:07+00:00 2026-06-13T08:47:07+00:00

If I have a C++ function declaration: int func(const vector<int> a) Would it always

  • 0

If I have a C++ function declaration:

int func(const vector<int> a)

Would it always be beneficial to replace it with

int func(const vector<int> &a)

since the latter does not need to make a copy of a to pass into the function?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T08:47:08+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 8:47 am

    In general, yes. You should always pass large objects by reference (or pass a pointer to them, especially if you are using C).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a function with the following declaration: void cleanValid(int valid[][4], int &size, int
I have this function declaration and its defination: declaration void laodFromFile( string const& fileName,
I have this function declaration and definition.. definition void loadFromFile( string const& fileName, Frames&
I have the following declaration in a header file: struct my_struct; int func(struct my_struct*
I have faced the following interview question. Consider this function declaration: void quiz(int i)
I have this function declaration: template<class T> a::A& a::A::operator<<(T out) { std::cout << out;
I have a function B that has this declaration: public void B(Class<? extends C>
I have the following function defined inside my linked list class. The declaration in
I have a declaration in a cpp where a function is like: virtual void
i have function public Menu Details(int? id) { return _dataContext.Menu.Include(ChildMenu).FirstOrDefault(m => m.MenuId == id);

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.