Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3454718
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:31:36+00:00 2026-05-18T09:31:36+00:00

If I have a class defined as such: class classWithInt { public: classWithInt(); …

  • 0

If I have a class defined as such:

class classWithInt
{
public:
    classWithInt();
...
private:
    int someInt;
...
}

and that someInt is the one and only one member variable in classWithInt, how much slower would it be to declare a new instance of this class than to just declare a new integer?

What about when you have, say 10 such integers in the class? 100?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:31:36+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:31 am

    With a compiler not written by drunk college students in the wee hours of the morning, the overhead is zero. At least until you start putting in virtual functions; then you must pay the cost for the virtual dispatch mechanism. Or if you have no data in the class, in which case the class is still required to take up some space (which in turn is because every object must have a unique address in memory).

    Functions are not part of the data layout of the object. They are only a part of the mental concept of the object. The function is translated into code that takes an instance of the object as an additional parameter, and calls to the member function are correspondingly translated to pass the object.

    The number of data members doesn’t matter. Compare apples to apples; if you have a class with 10 ints in it, then it takes up the same space that 10 ints would.

    Allocating things on the stack is effectively free, no matter what they are. The compiler adds up the size of all the local variables and adjusts the stack pointer all at once to make space for them. Allocating space in memory costs, but the cost will probably depend more on the number of allocations than the amount of space allocated.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

If I have the core of a class defined in one file as public
I have a private const int defined in a C# class. I want compilation
I have a class with two methods defined in it. public class Routines {
I have the following members defined in a class that I'm trying to deserialise:
Let's say we have defined a CSS class that is being applied to various
I have defined an interface in C++, i.e. a class containing only pure virtual
I have a few tables that I've defined like the below examples: class TableA
I have a templated class defined (in part) as template <class T> MyClass {
Suppose I have an array of a objects of user defined class. Wanted to
I have seen some C++ classes with a destructor defined as follows: class someClass

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.