Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5955145
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T18:04:20+00:00 2026-05-22T18:04:20+00:00

If I have a class named SomeClassName , can I avoid writing SomeClassName:: everytime

  • 0

If I have a class named SomeClassName, can I avoid writing SomeClassName:: everytime I am referring to something in that class? I am thinking along the lines of namespace where I can enclose the definitions in using MyNamespace { ... }; and avoid writing the namespace the class is under every time (bad practice?).

One of the reasons is that now I have code like this, which is quite long and hard to read imo:

SomeClassName::SimpleStruct SomeClassName::m_someTable[SomeClassName::m_someTableSize][SomeClassName::m_someTableSize] = {SomeClassName::EmptyStruct};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T18:04:21+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 6:04 pm

    No, but you can shorten the name with a typedef, if all you are after is less typing:

    typedef SomeClassName SCN;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class named utility in my App_code folder that holds the logic
Assuming that I have a class named Class , And I would like to
I have a class named Page with a private property currently called _pageData which
Say I have a class named Frog, it looks like: public class Frog {
I've got a philosophical programming problem. Let's say I have a class named Employees.
I've just started to learn about tie . I have a class named Link
I have a class named CreateListView in my project in a .cs file and
I have a class named Node as follow Public class T{ int value; public
I have a class named OrganizerNote with fields: public long id; public DateTime CreationDate;
If I have class names such as left, right, clear and xhtml like <a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.