Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 80351
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:17:20+00:00 2026-05-10T21:17:20+00:00

If I have a for loop which is nested within another, how can I

  • 0

If I have a for loop which is nested within another, how can I efficiently come out of both loops (inner and outer) in the quickest possible way?

I don’t want to have to use a boolean and then have to say go to another method, but rather just to execute the first line of code after the outer loop.

What is a quick and nice way of going about this?

I was thinking that exceptions aren’t cheap/should only be thrown in a truly exceptional condition etc. Hence I don’t think this solution would be good from a performance perspective.

I don’t feel it it is right to take advantage of the newer features in .NET (anon methods) to do something which is pretty fundamental.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:17:21+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:17 pm

    Well, goto, but that is ugly, and not always possible. You can also place the loops into a method (or an anon-method) and use return to exit back to the main code.

        // goto     for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)     {         for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++)         {             goto Foo; // yeuck!         }     } Foo:     Console.WriteLine('Hi'); 

    vs:

    // anon-method Action work = delegate {     for (int x = 0; x < 100; x++)     {         for (int y = 0; y < 100; y++)         {             return; // exits anon-method         }     } }; work(); // execute anon-method Console.WriteLine('Hi'); 

    Note that in C# 7 we should get ‘local functions’, which (syntax tbd etc) means it should work something like:

    // local function (declared **inside** another method) void Work() {     for (int x = 0; x < 100; x++)     {         for (int y = 0; y < 100; y++)         {             return; // exits local function         }     } }; Work(); // execute local function Console.WriteLine('Hi'); 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 122k
  • Answers 122k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer /root/*[not(self::a)] May 12, 2026 at 12:45 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you are using CAL(Prism) look into the Event Aggregator/CompositePresentationEvent… May 12, 2026 at 12:45 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think JavaScript’s regular expression don’t support look-behind assertions. So… May 12, 2026 at 12:45 am

Related Questions

I have created my own Tree implementation for various reasons and have come up
I'm writing a stored procedure that needs to have a lot of conditioning in
I've had the same problem with sql for a while and as I sit
.NET 3.5, C# I have a web app with a search feature. Some of

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.