Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 893039
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T14:09:20+00:00 2026-05-15T14:09:20+00:00

If I have a function like this void setSomeObject( SomeObjectClass obj /*, and some

  • 0

If I have a function like this

void setSomeObject( SomeObjectClass obj /*, and some other params*/ )
{
  [_previous autorelease];
  _previous = obj;
}

As far as I understood it the autorelease message is sent to the object itself (not _previous)
so at one point, sometime when setSomeObject goes out of scope the original object is autoreleased (if any). Is this correct? I am not using properties but I guess by using them the release of the previous object would be automatic when I do self.previous = obj; ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T14:09:20+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:09 pm

    When you send an -autorelease message to an object, it’s added to the active NSAutoreleasePool, which is emptied when the run loop runs. If you say [_previous autorelease], only that object will be autoreleased, and if you then say _previous = obj, that only changes the variable’s reference. The old object is still autoreleased.

    If you’re doing this in a setter method, this is what the pattern generally is:

    - (void)setSomeObject:(MyObjClass *obj) {
        if (obj != someObject) {
            [someObject release];
            someObject = [obj retain]; // or copy, depending on what you want
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 531k
  • Answers 531k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer RedirectMatch .*\/archives\/(.+) http://www.fractalbit.gr/?p=$1 RedirectMatch in Apache docs May 16, 2026 at 11:53 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Not entirely sure what your questions is - are you… May 16, 2026 at 11:53 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Latex doesn't use a white space character to separate words.… May 16, 2026 at 11:53 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

My C++ DLL have a function like this: void func1(int& count, int* pValue); this
Suppose I have a function like this: public void AddEntry(Entry entry) { if (entry.Size
I have a function using strtok like this void f1(char *name) { ... char
I have a function similar to this: void foo(obj ary[], int arysize) { for
I have some original code that manages exception safety like this: void foo() {
I am using Microsoft Visual C++ 2010. If I have a function like this:
Let's say I have a function that accepts a void (*)(void*) function pointer for
Please suppose I have a function that accepts a pointer as a parameter. This
I have thousands of function wrappers which inside actually perform a similar logic like:
I have some debugging code that looks like the following: #define STRINGIFY(x) #x #define

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.