Home/ Questions/Q 74937
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-10T20:26:12+00:00

If I have a function that returns an object, but this return value is

  • 0

If I have a function that returns an object, but this return value is never used by the caller, will the compiler optimize away the copy? (Possibly an always/sometimes/never answer.)

Elementary example:

ReturnValue MyClass::FunctionThatAltersMembersAndNeverFails() {     //Do stuff to members of MyClass that never fails     return successfulResultObject; }  void MyClass::DoWork() {     // Do some stuff     FunctionThatAltersMembersAndNeverFails();     // Do more stuff }

In this case, will the ReturnValue object get copied at all? Does it even get constructed? (I know it probably depends on the compiler, but let’s narrow this discussion down to the popular modern ones.)

EDIT: Let’s simplify this a bit, since there doesn’t seem to be a consensus in the general case. What if ReturnValue is an int, and we return 0 instead of successfulResultObject?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. If the ReturnValue class has a non-trivial copy constructor, the compiler must not eliminate the call to the copy constructor – it is mandated by the language that it is invoked.

    If the copy constructor is inline, the compiler might be able to inline the call, which in turn might cause a elimination of much of its code (also depending on whether FunctionThatAltersMembersAndNeverFails is inline).

    • 0