Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8074019
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T14:31:23+00:00 2026-06-05T14:31:23+00:00

if I have a hash my %foo = ( foo => 1, bar =>

  • 0

if I have a hash

my %foo = ( foo => 1, bar => 1 );

I want to check if any key of %foo is in a comparison array (and obviously keys %foo is just an array ). I keep thinking some weird syntax that does’t exist like.

my @cmp0 = qw( foo baz    );
my @cmp1 = qw( baz blargh );

if keys %foo in @cmp0 # returns true because key foo is in the array
if keys %foo in @cmp1 # returns false because no key in foo is an element of cmp1

What is the simplest way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T14:31:24+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 2:31 pm

    List::MoreUtils has a function called any that uses a syntax similar to grep, but stops its internal loop the first time the criteria are met. The advantage to this behavior is that far fewer iterations will be required (assuming random distribution of intersections).

    An additional advantage of any is code clarity: It is named for what it does. Perl Best Practices discourages using grep in Boolean context because the assumed use for grep is to return a list of elements that match. It works in Boolean context, but the intent of the code is less clear to a reader than any, which is designed specifically for Boolean usage.

    It is true that any adds a dependency on List::MoreUtils. However, List::MoreUtils is one of those modules that is so ubiquitous, it is highly likely to already be installed.

    Here’s an example:

    use List::MoreUtils qw( any );
    
    my %foo = ( foo => 1, bar => 1 );
    
    my @cmp0 = qw( foo baz    );
    my @cmp1 = qw( baz blargh );
    
    print "\@cmp0 and %foo have an intersection.\n" 
        if any { exists $foo{$_} } @cmp0;
    
    print "\@cmp1 and %foo have an intersection.\n"
        if any { exists $foo{$_} } @cmp1;
    

    Another option is the ~~ Smart Match Operator, which became available in Perl 5.10.0 and newer. It could be used like this:

    my %foo = ( foo => 1, bar => 1 );
    
    my @cmp0 = qw( foo baz    );
    my @cmp1 = qw( baz blargh );
    
    print "\@cmp0 and %foo have an intersection.\n" if @cmp0 ~~ %foo;
    
    print "\@cmp1 and %foo have an intersection.\n" if @cmp1 ~~ %foo;
    

    With smartmatch, you eliminate the List::MoreUtils dependency in favor of a minimum Perl version dependency. It’s up to you to decide whether the code is as clear as any.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So lets say I have a hash a = { foo : bar ,
I have a a hash foo = {'bar'=>'baz'} I would like to call foo.bar
Let's say I have the following hash: { :foo => 'bar', :baz => 'qux'
Say I have a hash like: h = { '0' => 'foo', 'bar' =>
Say I have a hash like: foo = { :bar => ['r', 'baz'], #
I have a hash table where the keys are rather complex lists, with sublists
I have a db column which is a serialized Hash : class Foo <
I have a hash table which stores IPs as strings for the key and
Say I have a macro, FOO(name), and some template class Bar<> that takes one
I have models foo, bar, and baz like so # has a field join_condition_string

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.