Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6591931
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T17:29:22+00:00 2026-05-25T17:29:22+00:00

If I have a large byte array already in memory received from a SOAP

  • 0

If I have a large byte array already in memory received from a SOAP response.

I have to write this byte array into an OutputStream.

It is OK just to use write:

byte [] largeByteArray=...;

outputstream.write(largeByteArray);

...
outputstream.flush();
...

or is better to split the bytearray in small chunks and to write that to the outputstream?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T17:29:22+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 5:29 pm

    If you’ve already got the large array, then just write it out – if the output stream implementation chooses to chunk it, it can make that decision. I can’t see a benefit in you doing that for it – which may well make it less efficient, if it’s able to handle large chunks.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm downloading some files asynchronously into a large byte array, and I have a
I have a byte array which contains an image fetched from the net. I
I have to process a large byte array that is passed to my function.
I have a byte array like this: lzo_bytep out; // my byte array size_t
I have a unit test where I have statically defined a quite large byte
I have a rather large SQL file which starts with the byte order marker
If a WCF service returns a byte array in its response message, there's a
I have run into an interesting problem lately: Lets say I have an array
I would like to append a byte array to an already existing file (C:\test.exe)
I am trying to set the image of an ImageView from a byte array

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.