Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6702477
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T07:03:31+00:00 2026-05-26T07:03:31+00:00

If I have a managed DLL and an unmanaged Explorer extension, is it possible

  • 0

If I have a managed DLL and an unmanaged Explorer extension, is it possible to load the managed DLL somehow without pulling the CLR into Explorer’s process space?

I understand that writing a managed Explorer extension is a no-no as it loads the CLR into Explorer and causes issues with any other plugins/extensions that happen to use the CLR, but I have some managed code that I would like to use in my extension. How can I avoid the problem?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T07:03:32+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:03 am

    Not an ideal answer, but a route you could consider nonetheless. Write an unmanaged proxy and call into a managed code service using named pipes / other IPC. It is a bit tacky and smells but if you are stuck..

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose we have an unmanaged process which loads a managed DLL. Within the DLL
I have a situation in which a managed DLL calls some unmanaged DLL. I
I have a managed C++ dll which uses a unmanaged C++ lib. I've added
I have an unmanaged class that I'm trying to dllexport from a managed DLL
I have a managed class library (say mylib.dll) and a 3rd party managed app
I have successfully implemented interop beftween Win32 application and managed .Net dll as described
Setup: I have a COM DLL that calls a method inside a managed C#
I hope to LoadLibrary on an unmanaged C++ DLL with managed code, and then
I have a solution with an unmanaged c++ dll project in it and a
I have a closed source unmanaged DLL coded in C++ that I wanted to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.