Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 220975
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:59:23+00:00 2026-05-11T18:59:23+00:00

If I have a private variable that I want to have some internal validation

  • 0

If I have a private variable that I want to have some internal validation on, and I want to keep that validation in one place, I put it behind a getter/setter and only access it thorugh that getter/setter. That’s useful when dealing with public properties, because the other code cannot access the private variable, but when I’m dealing with object inside the class itself, is there any way to enforce the getter/setter?

  private int _eyeOrientation;

  private int eyeOrientation
  {
     get
     {
        return _eyeOrientation;
     }
     set
     {
        if (value < 0)
        {
           _eyeOrientation = 0;
        }
        else
        {
           _eyeOrientation = value % 360;
        }
     }
  }

The issue here being that the other functions in the class may accidentally modify

_eyeOrientation = -1;

which would throw the program into a tizzy. Is there any way to get that to throw a compiler error?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:59:24+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:59 pm

    Sounds like you need a angle type.

    // Non mutable Angle class with a normalized, integer angle-value
    public struct Angle
    {
      public Angle(int value)
      {
        Value = value;
      } 
    
      private angle;
      public Value 
      { 
        get { return angle; } 
        private set { angle = Normalize(value); } 
      }
    
      public static int Normalize(int value)
      {
         if (value < 0) return 360 - (value % 360);
         return value % 360;
      }
    }
    
    public class SomeClass
    {
      public Angle EyeOrientation { get; set; }
    }
    

    If you have a certain kind of value, like angles, money, weight or whatever, it is always a good praxis to make it a own type, even if the value itself is stored in a int, decimal etc. This type makes your interfaces clearer and typesafe. It is not the same if you expect an Angle or a integer value as argument of some method.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an immutable class with some private fields that are set during the
I have a class that I want to put factory methods on to spit
I have read that private variables in a base class are technically inherited by
I have a private const int defined in a C# class. I want compilation
I have a project (private, ASP.net website, password protected with https) where one of
I have this method: private delegate void watcherReader(StreamReader sr); private void watchProc(StreamReader sr) {
Imagine I have the following: private IEnumerable MyFunc(parameter a) { using(MyDataContext dc = new
I have the following code: private static void WriteStartupInfo() { Settings settings = Settings.Default;
I have this method on a webpart: private IFilterData _filterData = null; [ConnectionConsumer(Filter Data
I have a method lets say: private static String drawCellValue( int maxCellLength, String cellValue,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.