Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7635047
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T07:20:30+00:00 2026-05-31T07:20:30+00:00

If I have a set of files *.foo that are compiled to a set

  • 0

If I have a set of files *.foo that are “compiled” to a set of *.bar using a foo2bar some.foo “compiler” I can write a Makefile like this:

  %.bar: %.foo
    <tab>foo2bar $<

However if there are no *.bar yet, I can’t just type something like make all and have all the *.bar produced.

How do I tell make to create all missing targets that match *.bar?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T07:20:32+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 7:20 am

    Provided you are using GNU make (which you seem to be since you used the %-notation already):

    all: $(patsubst %.foo,%.bar,$(wildcard *.foo))
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a Makefile.am file right now that looks like this: lib_LIBRARIES = foo.a
I have a large set of files, some of which contain special characters in
I have a set of html files that I want to modify by replacing
I have a set of WMV files that I need to convert to H.264.
I have a set of .csv files that I want to process. It would
I have a massive set of files (4000+) that are in an old Apple
I have some png files that I am applying a color to. The color
I have a project that includes some Java APIs, some resource files, and some
I am using RabbitMQ to have worker processes encode video files. I would like
I have a set of files. The set of files is read-only off a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.