Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8037315
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T02:53:41+00:00 2026-06-05T02:53:41+00:00

If i have a type defined as <xs:element name=serviceResponse> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref=status/> <xs:element

  • 0

If i have a type defined as

<xs:element name="serviceResponse">
        <xs:complexType>
            <xs:sequence>
                <xs:element ref="status"/>
                <xs:element ref="info"/>
                <xs:element ref="code"/>
            </xs:sequence>
        </xs:complexType>

And would like to have an additional type that defined as

      <xs:element name="serviceResponse">
        <xs:complexType>
            <xs:sequence>
                <xs:element ref="status"/>
                <xs:element ref="info"/>
                <xs:element ref="code"/>
                            <xs:element ref="level"/>
            </xs:sequence>
        </xs:complexType>
    </xs:element>

Is it possible to create a new type that extends the first type and only append the “level” element to the new type? (sort of like inheritance in Java)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T02:53:44+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 2:53 am

    It would be possible, if only the type of serviceResponse were a named type rather than anonymous:

        <xs:complexType name="serviceResponseType">
            <xs:sequence>
                <xs:element ref="status"/>
                <xs:element ref="info"/>
                <xs:element ref="code"/>
            </xs:sequence>
        </xs:complexType>
    
        <xs:complexType name="extendedType">
          <xs:complexContent>
            <xs:extension base="serviceResponseType">
               <xs:sequence>
                 <xs:element ref="level"/>
               </xs:sequence>
            </
         </
       </
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have these types defined in my XSD: <complexType name=NamedEntity> <attribute name=ix type=positiveInteger></attribute>
In an xsd file I have this element base type : <xs:complexType name=event abstract=true
I have a complex type defined which doesn't currently contain any minOccurs restrictions. When
I have a default concrete type defined in a registry: ForRequestedType<IXRepository>() .TheDefaultIsConcreteType<CacheXRepository>(); The ChaceXRepository
Suppose I have a user defined type: CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEST_TYPE AS OBJECT
I have a Enum defined as Type public Enum **Type** { OneType, TwoType, ThreeType
I have a user-defined table type. I want to check it's existence before editing
I have a stored procedure which accepts a User defined table type called SeasonTable
I have defined a table type PL/SQL variable and added some data there. create
I have defined a custom list template type for SharePoint . I install it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.