Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1066549
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T20:02:00+00:00 2026-05-16T20:02:00+00:00

If I have a very simple http directory: default.html info.html contact.html etc… Should default.html

  • 0

If I have a very simple http directory:

default.html
info.html
contact.html
etc...

Should default.html link to the other files in the directory, I’ve always been able to simply use an anchor tag thus:

<a href="contact" target="_self">Contact me!</a>

Will this always work, assuming that there is only one file in the directory with a name matching this extension-less href value?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T20:02:01+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 8:02 pm

    It depends on the server and how it is set-up.

    Remember that there’s no innate mapping between URIs and files on a webserver, the webserver is always following some sort of rule as to what file to send. The simplest takes the path part of the URI and does a direct mapping to a filepath local to the webserver, but it could be doing just about anything else. A common case is using the file extension to do con-neg, so if you have contact.html and contact.atom and so on in the same local directory corresponding to the path, it picks that closest to the Accept header from the user-agent.

    Putting file extensions (whether of “static” files or handlers like .php, .aspx, etc.) in URIs is rather pointless since there is no such thing as a file on the web (there are files on the server, and the client can save the stream to a file, but on the web itself there are octet streams that may or may not correspond to a file). And less than ideal; presumably contact.html has something to do with contact details, while “contact” expresses this idea well, “.html” has nothing to do with contact details and doesn’t belong there.

    Hence the more sensible URI would not have “.html” in it, unless this was in some way expressing something useful (such as explicitly asking for a HTML version and bypassing content-negotiation, or if the page was actually about HTML).

    On the other hand, just mapping directly to file names is a quick and easy way to do things, so while I certainly frown on such arbitrary cruft in URIs I won’t jump through too many hoops not to use it, especially in secondary URIs used for stylesheets, images etc. rather than those which are expected to regularly appear in the address bar of a browser.

    On the third hand, once you remove such cruft, adding more sophisticated handling later if required, becomes a much easier transition.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Take a very simple case as an example, say I have this URL: http://www.example.com/65167.html
I have a very simple class using HttpListener to receive an HTTP POST from
i have very simple problem. I need to create model, that represent element of
I have very simple select like this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE column1 IN
I have a very simple problem which requires a very quick and simple solution
I have a very simple WPF application in which I am using data binding
I have a very simple bit of script that changes the status of an
I have a very simple TCP server written in C. It runs indefinitely, waiting
I have a very simple Java RMI Server that looks like the following: import
I have a very simple ASP.Net page that acts as a front end for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.