Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 984087
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T04:57:31+00:00 2026-05-16T04:57:31+00:00

If I have an Application like this: Class Application { List state1 = new

  • 0

If I have an Application like this:

Class Application {  
    List state1 = new ArrayList();  
    Map state2  = new HashMap();  
}  

And I have a RPC service run in an other thread that uses to report the state of Application(such as: how many item in state1, which are containing in state2 keys).
What’s the best way to do that? I’m finding the way to avoid using synchronize when access to state1 and state2 fields(which maybe slow down performance of application).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T04:57:31+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:57 am

    There are two aspects to the cost of synchronization.

    1. The overhead of synchronized itself; and

    2. The cost of the operations performed within that block.

    To give you an example:

    public synchronized int[] getState() {
     return new int[] { state1.size(), state2.size() };
    }
    

    this is used for the lock. The operations in this case are extremely cheap (ie getting the size() of a Colleciton or Map). So the only overhead to worry about is the cost of synchronized itself.

    In modern JVMs the cost of so low that it isn’t even worth worrying about except in the most extreme of situations. By “most extreme” I mean where the number of such calls is incredibly large or the required latency is incredibly low (sub-microsecond).

    So just use synchronized. It’s far more readable and performance simply isn’t an issue for what you want, unless there’s something more to this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 515k
  • Answers 515k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In your second example you're using a correlated subquery. You… May 16, 2026 at 6:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer DELETE FROM articles_comments WHERE article_id = 76; May 16, 2026 at 6:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There does not exist a default location for the repository.… May 16, 2026 at 6:36 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I have a list of Gesture classes in my application: List<Gesture> gestures = new
I'm trying to build a simple application, with the finished program looking like this
I have these two models: class Application_Model_List extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract { protected $_name = 'list';
I have this situation: web application with cca 200 concurent requests (Threads) are in
I'm working on a .NET phone application where I have a list of items
I have written my Container<T> class which backups its T items in several collections
In my application I have to maintain some global application state and global application
I'm creating a cool Home application in Android. As this is a Home app
I have a listview that needs to be multiple choice (i.e each list item
I have called a function from a class to find all the items related

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.