Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
If I have an dependency Jar for my application is it better to place it in the war files lib directory or to place it in the global application server (like Tomcat) lib directory? What do I gain by using one approach over another?
Diskspace springs to mind, but we live in a time when diskspace is cheap. Is there a memory usage difference? Can someone with more experience then me list the pros and cons of both options?
Generally speaking, it’s much better to have WAR self-contained so you don’t have to rely on the container configuration. It makes deployment much easier also. So try to put library in the WAR if you can.
However, I ran into cases when installing libraries to container makes sense. For example,
We have some internal libraries used by every webapp and they are huge. We install them to container so all the webapps use the same version and it saves on memory and diskspace too.
Libraries installed in WEB-INF/lib is not available to container. If you need to reference these in context.xml (like JDBC driver defined in Resources), you have to put them in server/lib.
If you want send log4j logs from all the webapps to the same file, you have to put log4j jar in the server/lib. Otherwise, each webapp uses its own logger.