Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1093865
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T23:53:20+00:00 2026-05-16T23:53:20+00:00

if i have for example class A which contains the functions: //this is in

  • 0

if i have for example class A which contains the functions:

//this is in A.h
friend const A operator+ (const A& a,const A& b);
friend const A operator* (const A& a,const A& b);

which is a global (for my understanding). this function implemented in A.cpp.

now, i have class B which also contains the functions, and the member:

//this is in B.h
friend const B operator+ (const B& a,const B& b);
friend const B operator* (const B& a,const B& b);
A _a;

instead of using two seperate methods, i want to create single method in B.h:

static const B Calc(const B&, const B&, funcP);

which implemented in B.cpp and funcP is typedef to the pointer to the function above:

typedef const A (*funcP) ( const A& a, const A& b);

but when i tried to call Calc(..) inside the function i get this error:
“unresolved overloaded function type”. i call it this way:

friend const B operator+ (const B& a,const B& b){
    ...
    return B::Calc(a,b, &operator+);
}

what am i doing wrong?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T23:53:20+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:53 pm

    Overloaded functions are usually resolved based on the types of their arguments. When you make a pointer to a function this isn’t possible so you have to use the address-of operator in a context that is unambiguous.

    A cast is one way to achieve this.

    static_cast<funcP>(&operator+)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.