Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6687769
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T05:19:39+00:00 2026-05-26T05:19:39+00:00

If I have more than one semaphore, how can I have a process block

  • 0

If I have more than one semaphore, how can I have a process block until at least one of the semaphores is free? I know I can do this with a busy-wait loop such as:

// blocks until one of the semaphores in sems is free, returns
// index of semaphore that was available
int multiple_sem_wait(sem_t **sems, int num_sems) {
   while (true) {
      for (int i = 0; i < num_sems; ++i) {
         if (sem_trywait(sems[i]) == 0) {
            return i;
         }
      }
   }
}

But is there a way to do this without a busy-loop? Perhaps there’s some IPC technique other than semaphores that I should be using?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T05:19:39+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 5:19 am

    Here (developers.sun.com, via the Internet Archive) is a short paper from Sun about how they implemented their WaitForMultipleObjects emulation in Solaris. The basic idea is to associate a list of condition variables to a handle (protected by a mutex), and signal all of the condition variables whenever the handle is signaled. Each time you call the emulated WaitForMultipleObjects, a new condition variable is created and added to the list of all handles you are interested in. In the WaitForMultipleObjects emulation, you block on the condition variable, and check each of your handles when you wake up.

    The reason why there is a list of condition variables (and not a single one) is that you may have two threads blocking on handles: thread 1 is blocked on A and B, and thread 2 is blocked on A and C. Signaling B should not wake up thread 2. Since each call to WaitForMultipleObjects create a new condition variable, in this scenario, B and C will have one distinct condition variable each, and A will have both condition variables.

    For more detailed info, you will need to read the article itself.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know I have more than one result in the table, can anyone tell
Can a Objective c interface have more than one implementation? Example I could have
If we can have more than one .config files, we can share one config
Can you have more than one CustomValidator on a single page? I have two
I'm given a graph which can have more than one arch between 2 nodes.
The situation is this: I have more than one remote repository - for reference,
I know that setScrollsToTop gets confused when you have more than one scrollable view,
Can Anfis (Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems) in Matlab can have more than one output?
I have more than one doubt so please bear with me. Can someone tell
Can I have more than one method with @Parameters in junit test class which

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.