Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
If I have tables like this:
ImportSet1.Users ImportSet2.Users ImportSet3.Users Then in my sproc I do this:
CREATE PROCEDURE [ImportSet2].[UpdateUsers] ... UPDATE Users set blah = 234 WHERE id = 234 This seems to work, but why? Since when did that prefix [ImportSet2] signify part of the table name? (in this case ImportSet2)
The sproc is built under the ImportSet2 schema, so, by default, it will reference objects in the ImportSet2 schema if no schema name is specified.
I believe it is best-practice, however, to fully-qualify objects with their schema name.