Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 771235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T18:37:14+00:00 2026-05-14T18:37:14+00:00

If I have the following lines inside a loop: Type *unite = new Type(newSize);

  • 0

If I have the following lines inside a loop:

Type *unite = new Type(newSize); 

or

double *array= new double[anySize];

what is the behavior in what concerns to memory if I don’t have delete operators inside it? It will be constantly allocating objects and arrays on different memory locations, and therefore memory leaks?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T18:37:15+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:37 pm

    Yes it will. This:

    for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) 
    {
      Type* unite = new Type(newSize);
    }
    

    will allocate 10 objects of type Type, all at different locations. None of them will be deallocated, and at the end you will not have a pointer to any of them. You will leak 10 * sizeof(Type) bytes of memory.

    Similarly, this

    for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) 
    {
      double *array= new double[anySize];
    }
    

    will for the same reason leak 10 * anySize * sizeof(double) bytes of memory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So, I have the following line of code, that does a for loop and
I have the following function inside my HomeController class: public class HomeController : Controller
I have the following User.h that holds several attributes (strings). User.cpp has all the
I have a multi dimensional array called soldier: Array ( [0] => Array (
I have the following code: new_index = index + offset if new_index < 0:
gcc 4.4.4 c89 Is there a better way to do this? I have the
CSS & html id0 is the class for the div that's got background as
Problem: I want to get all locations from a database and encase them all
This is going to seem extremely trivial, but it just doesn't make any sense
I tried to make a simple test with facebox_render and rails 3. Here are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.