Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8405927
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T22:57:31+00:00 2026-06-09T22:57:31+00:00

If I have the following markup <html> <body> <div id=wrapper> <div id=container> <p>Lots of

  • 0

If I have the following markup

<html>
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="container">
<p>Lots of pragraphs here</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>

with the following styles

html, body, #wrapper
{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#container
{
width: 960px;
margin: 0 auto;
}

why does not my html, body and wrapper elements extend to 100% height of the browser/view port in FF13. The html, body and wrapper stop vertically about some distance from the bottom when looking in Firebug. The container div extends to the full height as it’s height is determined by the content.

(1263px X 558px for html, body, wrapper) and (960px X 880px for container)

Looking at default 100% the above happens as the first image below shows. But when I zoom to the last poosible zoom in, the above does not happen as the second image below shows and the html, body, wrapper extends to the full height.

(4267px X 1860px for html, body, wrapper) – (960px X 1000px for container)

enter image description here
enter image description here

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T22:57:32+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 10:57 pm

    Your html actually exactly extends to 100% height of your viewport cause viewport here is the browser window, not the inner content.

    Consider this (jsfiddle):

    <div id="div1">
        <div  id="div2">
            <div  id="div3">
                very much content
            </div>
        </div>
    </div>
    
    #div1 {
        height:300px;
        overflow-y:scroll;
        border: 1px solid black;
    }
    #div2 {
        height:100%;
    }
    #div3 {
        height:600px;
    }
    

    div1 here has the height of 300px and is scrolled. When you scroll content you simply move inner div but height remains untouched that is 300px. Exactly the same happens when you set height:100% to html. Your browser’s height remains the same.

    When you zoomed out your viewport then you have not scroll, so inner content’s height is less than the height of viewport.

    Shortly, html {height:100%} relates to parent’s height not to the height of the inner content


    UPDATE:

    you can specify 3 types of values to the block-element’s height:

    • length – set fixed height (i.g. ‘200px’, ’50em’). That’s all, I can say nothing more about that.

    • percentage – from W3C spec:

    The percentage is calculated with respect to the height of the generated box’s containing block. If the height of the containing block is not specified explicitly (i.e., it depends on content height), and this element is not absolutely positioned, the value computes to ‘auto’. A percentage height on the root element is relative to the initial containing block.

    • auto – The height depends on the values of other properties. (Generally on the height of inner content: text, other inline elements, block elements etc.)

    What is happening when browser shows your page:

    1. it gets height: 100% for <html>. That means that the resulting height is calculated with respect to the height of the generated box’s (html-element in that case) containing block (initial containing block, i.e. browser window in that case). Let’s say 1024px.
    2. then it takes height: 100% for <body>. It will set body‘s height to the already calculated height of the html, that is 1024px.
    3. then browser applies height:auto to the #wrapper and then the #container and the <p>. I don’t know how it does that exactly but can suppose that it postpones the height setting (and respectively all other styles which depend on that i.e. backgrounds, borders etc.) and proceeds to the inner content.
    4. next point is text content. Browser takes related properties specified or it’s own, that is default styles, like font-family, font-size and the height of the text.
    5. after that it will set height to the <p>-element so the <p> will stretch down to contain all content (the text in that case). The same then happens to the #container and the #wrapper.

    If it happens that the height of the #wrapper is greater than the body’s one (1024 px as it were agreed) than the overflow should be applied to the body. That is visible which is the default. Then overflow: visible is applied to the html. Then browser shows scroll for the entire window. Honestly, I don’t know whether this is specified by the W3C spec, but can suppose it is.

    So when you scroll the window your html and body are moved as are all the other elements. This is the same behavior as is with any other elements (like in jsfiddle I posted above):

    scrolled part of the body

    Note that the background is set on the body element, but it extends to the entire canvas i.e. far beyond of the body element itself. This is towards your concern of the possible necessity of setting bg-property on the body. This is 100% compliant with the W3C spec which states (cutted):

    For documents whose root element is an … “html” element that has computed values of ‘transparent’ for ‘background-color’ and ‘none’ for ‘background-image’, user agents must instead use the computed value of the background properties from that element’s first … “body” element child when painting backgrounds for the canvas, and must not paint a background for that child element. Such backgrounds must also be anchored at the same point as they would be if they were painted only for the root element.

    When you zoom out your page then browser recalculates all dimensions. Let’s say, with each Ctrl + - click page shrinks, for example, for 20 %. Then all your text is reduced, cause its height depends on the font-size, which is affected by the Ctrl + - click, correspondingly <p>, #container and #wrapper all are reduced cause their height depends on text‘s height. But body and html both have height which depends on the window‘s height which is not affected by the Ctrl + - click. That is why you finally get this:
    zoomed out page

    There is no difference here between width and height behavior in that case. You don’t see the same issue with horizontal dimension simply because you’ve set width: 960px; for the #container which turned out to be less than your browser window’s width, so no overflowing occurs. If the width of the #container were exceeding body’s width you would see this:
    same issue but with the width

    This all is a normal and expected behavior and there is nothing to solve here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following markup. <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang=en> <body> <div id=wrapper> <div id=container>
I have the following HTML markup: <body> <div class=wrapper> <div class=head> <p class=title>title</p> <a
I have following HTML markup, <div id=subcontent_l> <p> <a href=/membership-packages/><img height=202 width=644 alt= src=http://74.52.72.231/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/banner1.jpg
I have the following HTML markup, <section> <img width=106 height=113 title=key-staff-tim alt=key-staff-tim class=attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image
I have the following html markup: <div class=wrap_select> <span class=select id=selectdateRange>Today, 25 March, Sun</span>
I have the following HTML snippet: <body> <div class=main> <div class=topBar> <p>testing</p> </div> <div
I have following html markup, bit more than demo here with mixture of li/ul
I have the following HTML markup : <a class=link1 href=javascript:load(0,1);>Click here</a><span class=loader></span> The load
I have the following HTML markup and I want the menu div tag to
I have the following html markup on my page, <div id=sig_container> <div id=layer1 class=layer

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.