Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 535041
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:40:29+00:00 2026-05-13T09:40:29+00:00

If I initialize a generic dictionary once, and no further adds/updates/removes are allowed, is

  • 0

If I initialize a generic dictionary once, and no further adds/updates/removes are allowed, is it safe to have multiple threads reading from it with no locking (assuming that the dictionary is initialized before the readers are started)?

There is a note in the help for the non-generic HashTable that says that it is safe for multiple readers, but I did not see something similar for the Generic Dictionary.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:40:30+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:40 am

    For your future reference, the documentation is here:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xfhwa508.aspx

    It says:

    A Dictionary
    can support multiple readers
    concurrently, as long as the
    collection is not modified. Even so,
    enumerating through a collection is
    intrinsically not a thread-safe
    procedure. In the rare case where an
    enumeration contends with write
    accesses, the collection must be
    locked during the entire enumeration.
    To allow the collection to be accessed
    by multiple threads for reading and
    writing, you must implement your own
    synchronization.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to test if a collection is already initialized? try-catch only?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.