Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8818727
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T05:10:42+00:00 2026-06-14T05:10:42+00:00

If I remember correctly, older versions of Internet Explorer didn’t support the for..in statement

  • 0

If I remember correctly, older versions of Internet Explorer didn’t support the for..in statement.

I’ve no idea which versions though, and it’s not the easiest thing to Google.

According to Microsoft, it’s supported in Quirks Mode, and in standards mode from IE 6 onwards:

  • http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ie/55wb2d34(v=vs.94).aspx (“Requirements” section near the bottom)

Which version of Internet Explorer added support for this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T05:10:43+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 5:10 am

    As far as I can remember, every browser ever supporting JS has had to have support for ... in because until recently it was the only way to enumerate the keys of an object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am not sure if I remember correctly, but I think I read once
If I remember correctly, in past versions of Visual Studio (6, 2003, 2005), if
If I remember correctly Python ships with Tk as it's standard framework. What's Ruby's
NOTE: I'm using a BSD based system so if I remember correctly this means
I remember the days (not too long ago, really) when log4net came along with
I remember reading something once, but could not find it now while searching, if
I can't seem to find out anywhere but if I remember correctly there was
In Donald Knuth's Literate Programming , there was if I remember correctly a graph
If I remember correctly the ObjectId of a MongoDB document contains the timestamp of
If I remember correctly, modern cameras send out an ultrasound wave and measure time

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.