Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 682545
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:36:28+00:00 2026-05-14T01:36:28+00:00

If I step through the following code the call to ReturnOne() is skipped. static

  • 0

If I step through the following code the call to ReturnOne() is skipped.

static IEnumerable<int> OneThroughFive()
{
    ReturnOne();
    yield return 2;
    yield return 3;
    yield return 4;
    yield return 5;
}

static IEnumerator<int> ReturnOne()
{
    yield return 1;
}

I can only assume the compiler is stripping it out because what I’m doing is not valid. I’d like the ability to isolate my enumeration into various methods. Is this possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:36:28+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:36 am

    You’re not actually using the result of ReturnOne. You’re calling the method, and ignoring the return value… which means you’d never actually see any of your code being run. You can do it like this:

    static IEnumerable<int> OneThroughFive()
    {
        foreach (int x in ReturnOne())
        {
            yield x;
        }
        yield return 2;
        yield return 3;
        yield return 4;
        yield return 5;
    }
    

    C# doesn’t (currently at least 🙂 have a sort of “yield all” construct.

    The fact that you’re not getting to step into it has nothing to do with the fact that you’ve got a call within an iterator block – it’s just that until you start using the result of an iterator block, none of the code runs. That’s why you need to separate out argument validation from yielding. For example, consider this code:

    public IEnumerator<string> ReturnSubstrings(string x)
    {
        if (x == null)
        {
             throw ArgumentNullException();
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < x.Length; i++)
        {
             yield return x.Substring(i);
        }
    }
    ...
    ReturnSubstring(null); // No exception thrown
    

    You need to write it like this:

    public IEnumerator<string> ReturnSubstrings(string x)
    {
        if (x == null)
        {
             throw ArgumentNullException();
        }
        return ReturnSubstringsImpl(x);
    }
    
    private IEnumerator<string> ReturnSubstringsImpl(string x)
    {
        for (int i = 0; i < x.Length; i++)
        {
             yield return x.Substring(i);
        }
    }
    

    For more details, read chapter 6 of C# in Depth – which happens to be a free chapter in the first edition 🙂 Grab it here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 357k
  • Answers 357k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The other answers are correct. Here is some code you… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer you ruin the noConflict concept by reassigning the jquery to… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you get that particular error, you don't actually have… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am

Related Questions

No related questions found

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.