Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6668669
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T03:03:58+00:00 2026-05-26T03:03:58+00:00

If I understand it correctly, because ARM instructions are 32 bits long they can

  • 0

If I understand it correctly, because ARM instructions are 32 bits long they can only hold so many bits of immediate value. What I’m trying to do is vmov.f32 s0, #0.0, and I get “immediate out of range” compiler error. Strange thing is that when I use an immediate value of, say #0.5 or #0.25 (all very neatly represented in binary), my code compiles. When I try to assign an immediate value of #0.1, I get the “garbage after following instruction” error, which makes sense if it’s trying to represent those values with more bits that can fit into an ARM instruction. The #0.0 case is the only one where I get “immediate out of range“, so I’m thinking it’s got to be a bug if there’s no other explanation.

Does anyone know how to assign an immediate value of #0.0 to a single word floating point register without having to convert it from somewhere else? If there’s a good reason it shouldn’t work in the first place, please let me know as well. I’m using GNU assembler with Android NDK build tool.

Update:
vmov.f32 d0, #0.0 does work. It keeps making less and less sense.

Update 2:
This doesn’t work either: vmov.s32 s0, #0

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T03:03:59+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 3:03 am

    0.0 is not representable as a VFP/NEON floating-point immediate. Representable floating-point immediates are between 1/8 and 31 in magnitude, which zero clearly isn’t.

    The corresponding bit pattern, however, is representable as an integer NEON immediate. Your assembler is being helpful and generating this encoding for you instead of an (impossible) floating-point immediate; when you write vmov.f32 d0, #0.0 it actually emits vmov.s32 d0, #0, which has the same effect as what you appear to be trying to do, but is actually a legal instruction.

    vmov.s32 s0, #0 doesn’t make any sense; NEON does not provide any instructions that operate on s registers.

    If you just want to zero a NEON register, however, the preferred idiom is usually veor d0, d0. Is there a reason that you aren’t using that?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

If I understand correctly, ClickOnce only checks for prerequisites with the first install of
If I understand correctly, in .NET the default implementation of Object.GetHashCode() returns a value
Been trying my best to understand this correctly. What is the difference between an
really can't understand, how to build correctly project that uses boost.python. I've included boost_(python/thread/system)-mt.
If I understand correctly the .net runtime will always clean up after me. So
This is just a quick question to understand correctly what happens when you create
If I understand this correctly: Current CPU developing companies like AMD and Intel have
If I understand it correctly this means extern void foo(); that the function foo
I've just read up on Thread.IsBackground and if I understand it correctly, when it's
Why does this not work? Do I not understand delegate covariance correctly? public delegate

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.