Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8565955
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T17:32:50+00:00 2026-06-11T17:32:50+00:00

If I understand the following code from the QFutureWatcher documentation correctly, then there is

  • 0

If I understand the following code from the QFutureWatcher documentation correctly, then there is a race condition between the last to lines:

// Instantiate the objects and connect to the finished signal.
MyClass myObject;
QFutureWatcher<int> watcher;
connect(&watcher, SIGNAL(finished()), &myObject, SLOT(handleFinished()));

// Start the computation.
QFuture<int> future = QtConcurrent::run(...);
watcher.setFuture(future);

If the function ... in the QtConcurrent::run(...) finishes before the next line is called, then the watcher.finished() signal will never be triggered. Is my assumption correct? How do I work around this bug?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T17:32:51+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 5:32 pm

    From http://doc.qt.io/qt-4.8/qfuturewatcher.html#setFuture

    One of the signals might be emitted for the current state of the
    future. For example, if the future is already stopped, the finished
    signal will be emitted.

    In other words, if QtConcurrent::run(...) completes before setFuture is called, setFuture will still emit a signal on the current state of the QFuture. So, you don’t need to do anything in order to avoid a race condition.

    However, depending on the rest of your code, you may need to call QFuture::waitForFinished() in order to ensure that your MyClass, QFuture and QFutureWatcher do not go out of scope before QtConcurrent::run(...) completes.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How should I understand $(select option:selected) in the following code ? (taken from here
I found the following code example (from Telerik ) that I'm trying to understand.
I would like to understand the following code from Zenphoto’s plugin: $plugin_is_filter = 5|ADMIN_PLUGIN|THEME_PLUGIN;
I'm tying to understand Code Contracts advantages. I've wrote following code (from PEX +
I don't understand the following code on page 87 of Practical Django Projects: from
I'm getting an error I don't really understand from the following code: public IList<Store>
In the following code if I understand joins in RX correctly, I should see
I understand that the following code ( from here ) is used to read
I am trying to understand what the following code segment from tls.h in glibc
Please help me understand the following code snippet :- def any(l): whether any number

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.