Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 54109
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:10:07+00:00 2026-05-10T17:10:07+00:00

If I want to call Bar() instead of Foo() , does Bar() return me

  • 0

If I want to call Bar() instead of Foo(), does Bar() return me a copy (additional overhead) of what Foo() returns, or it returns the same object which Foo() places on the temporary stack?

vector<int> Foo(){       vector<int> result;       result.push_back(1);       return result;   }   vector<int> Bar(){       return Foo();   } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:10:07+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:10 pm

    Both may happen. However, most compiler will not do copy as soon as you optimize.

    Your code indicate there should be a copy. However, the compiler is allowed to remove any copy that do not change the semantic and the program.

    Note: This is why you should NEVER have a copy constructor that does anything but copying correctly as you can never be sure if a copy will be actually done or not.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to call a function which is in another php class that I
I have a base class Foo that has an Update() function, which I want
I want to write a clojurescript function that returns a complex item like [foo
I'm wondering if there's a way to return an object instead of a string
I have a model Foo and a model Bar, both of which has_many :bar_foos
Consider this: Function Foo { param( #???? ) } I want to call Foo
I want to call a webservice using google closures, via jsonp since i am
I want to call a html page on click of a button in mvc.
i want to call the command prompt command using Process.Start and then using StandardOutput
I want to call a method say success(message) of javascript from android activity. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.