Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 115959
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T03:06:08+00:00 2026-05-11T03:06:08+00:00

If I write a #define that performs an operation using other preprocessor constants, is

  • 0

If I write a #define that performs an operation using other preprocessor constants, is the final value computed each time the macro appears at runtime? Does this depend on optimizations in the compiler, or is it covered under a standard?

Example:

#define EXTERNAL_CLOCK_FREQUENCY    32768 #define TIMER_1_S                   EXTERNAL_CLOCK_FREQUENCY #define TIMER_100_MS                TIMERB_1_S / 10 

Will the operation 32768 / 10 occur at runtime every time I use the TIMER_100_MS macro?

I would like to avoid the following:

#define EXTERNAL_CLOCK_FREQUENCY    32768 #define TIMER_1_S                   EXTERNAL_CLOCK_FREQUENCY #define TIMER_100_MS                3276 

Summary

A compiler is required to be able to evaluate constant integral expressions because they are necessary for calculating things like array sizes at compile time. However, the standard only says they ‘can’ — not ‘must’ — do so. Therefore, only a brain-dead compiler would not evaluate a constant integral expressions at compile time, but a simple check of the assembly output for an unconventional compiler would verify each case.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T03:06:08+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:06 am

    Macros are simply textual substitution, so in your example writing TIMER_100_MS in a program is a fancy way of writing 32768 / 10.

    Therefore, the question is when the compiler would evaluate 32768 / 10, which is a constant integral expression. I don’t think the standard requires any particular behavior here (since run-time and compile-time evaluation is indistinguishable in effect), but any halfway decent compiler will evaluate it at compile time.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 89k
  • Answers 89k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Create your own analyzer by extending WhiteSpaceAnalyzer and override tokenStream… May 11, 2026 at 5:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try the following if it is actually of type List<T>.… May 11, 2026 at 5:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Based on your comments it sounds like you have a… May 11, 2026 at 5:57 pm

Related Questions

I understand, in a fuzzy sort of way, how regular ACID transactions work. You
In his excellent book, CLR Via C#, Jeffrey Richter said that he doesn't like
I've just started learning how to use the Entity Framework to write a very
I have a few things that I cannot find a good way to perform

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.