Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8053959
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T08:01:12+00:00 2026-06-05T08:01:12+00:00

If I’m not mistaken, subclasses of Exceptions should be caught first. But having to

  • 0

If I’m not mistaken, subclasses of Exceptions should be caught first. But having to catch any RuntimeException and a concrete checked Exception, which should be caught at first?

try {
    ...
} catch(RuntimeException e) {
    ...
} catch(IOException e) {
    ...
}

Is this order a correct one? Or is it correct but a bad option?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T08:01:16+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 8:01 am

    The order is whatever matches first, gets executed (as the JLS clearly explains).

    If the first catch matches the exception, it executes, if it doesn’t, the next one is tried and on and on until one is matched or none are.

    So, when catching exceptions you want to always catch the most specific first and then the most generic (as RuntimeException or Exception). For instance, imagine you would like to catch the StringIndexOutOfBoundsException thrown by the String.charAt(index) method but your code could also throw a NullPointerException, here’s how you could go to catch the exceptions:

    String s = null;
    try {
      s.charAt(10);
    } catch ( NullPointerExeption e ) {
      System.out.println("null");
      e.printStackTrace();
    } catch ( StringIndexOutOfBoundsException e ) {
      System.out.println("String index error!");
      e.printStackTrace();
    } catch ( RuntimeException e ) {
      System.out.println("runtime exception!");
      e.printStackTrace();
    }
    

    So, with this order, I am making sure the exceptions are caught correctly and they are not tripping over one another, if it’s a NullPointerException it enters the first catch, if a StringIndexOutOfBoundsException it enters the second and finally if it is something else that is a RuntimeException (or inherits from it, like a IllegalArgumentException) it enters the third catch.

    Your case is correct as IOException inherits from Exception and RuntimeException also inherits from Exception, so they will not trip over one another.

    It’s also a compilation error to catch a generic exception first and then one of it’s descendants later, as in:

    try {
      // some code here
    } catch ( Exception e) {
      e.printStackTrace();
    } catch ( RuntimeException e ) { // this line will cause a compilation error because it would never be executed since the first catch would pick the exception
      e.printStackTrace();
    }
    

    So, you should have the children first and then the parent exceptions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
This could be a duplicate question, but I have no idea what search terms
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
I want to construct a data frame in an Rcpp function, but when I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.