Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 472175
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T00:03:36+00:00 2026-05-13T00:03:36+00:00

If I’m turning a ruby hash into a string of name-value pairs (to be

  • 0

If I’m turning a ruby hash into a string of name-value pairs (to be used in HTTP params, for example), is this the best way?

# Define the hash
fields = {"a" => "foo", "b" => "bar"}

# Turn it into the name-value string
http_params = fields.map{|k,v| "#{k}=#{v}"}.join('&')

I guess my question is:

Is there an easier way to get to http_params? Granted, the above way works and is fairly straightforward, but I’m curious if there’s a way to get from the hash to the string without first creating an array (the result of the map method)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T00:03:37+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:03 am

    This is probably the best you can do. You could iterate through the pairs in the hash, building the string as you go. But in this case the intermediate string would need to be created and deleted at each step.

    Do you have a use-case where this is a performance bottleneck? In general Ruby is doing so much work behind the scenes that worrying about a temporary array like this is probably not worth it. If you are concerned that it may be a problem, consider profiling your code for speed and memory usage, often the results are not what you expect.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 309k
  • Answers 309k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I am so stupid. Turns out like I forgot the… May 13, 2026 at 10:03 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Add RegexKitLite.h and RegexKitLite.m into your project. Add the SDK… May 13, 2026 at 10:03 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer fix the z-index's? May 13, 2026 at 10:03 pm

Related Questions

this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I have text I am displaying in SIlverlight that is coming from a CMS
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on
If I've got a table containing Field1 and Field2 can I generate a new

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.