Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6208713
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T05:51:16+00:00 2026-05-24T05:51:16+00:00

If I’m using a method to return an NSArray, and inside that method I

  • 0

If I’m using a method to return an NSArray, and inside that method I build up the result as a NSMutableArray, I’m often tempted to put return [NSArray arrayWithArray:myMutable] instead of return myMutable just to lock it up and prevent mutation by some devious other code that might check isMemberOfClass on it and do some mutations.

If I’m just coding for myself, and I know I will treat return values as being what they say they are, is there any reason to switch it to NSArray before returning it? Any advantage I’m not seeing here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T05:51:18+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 5:51 am

    There’s no real advantage in doing this; in general you should expect that clients of your interface will respect the contract of that interface.

    In the case of many of the Foundation value and container types (NSString, etc.), it matters even less; due to an implementation detail of the toll-free bridging mechanism, both the mutable and immutable variants are actually instances of the same class. The init methods for NSString and NSMutableString, for example, both actually return an instance of __NSCFString, which inherits from both. This object retains the mutability or immutability of the API you called, but you can’t tell by looking at the class whether it’s mutable or not.

    In other words, [aString isKindOfClass:[NSMutableString class]] will always return YES, regardless of whether you created a mutable object or not. As a result, using that API to check whether something is mutable or not doesn’t work anyway, so there’s no point in worrying whether clients of your API will try to do it.

    Edit:
    I originally stated that you couldn’t tell by inspecting the class of an array whether it was mutable or not, but it turns out that in the case of NSArray, you can tell. (Thanks to @albertamg for catching the error.) I’ve changed the examples above to use NSString, which is a case where you really can’t tell. In general, though, I would consider it a bug if someone treated an object you returned as mutable when it wasn’t vended as such, and wouldn’t worry about programming around it.

    Edit again:
    So it turns out that in some versions of OS X and iOS, you can’t detect mutablility of NSArray either, but in more recent versions, they’ve changed the implementation such that you can. You still can’t detect it in NSString, though. The lesson to take home from all of this, then, is that you shouldn’t be using isKindOfClass: on objects that are part of a class cluster.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.