Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7506235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T22:11:42+00:00 2026-05-29T22:11:42+00:00

If in a class I have a ConcurrentHashMap instance that will be modified and

  • 0

If in a class I have a ConcurrentHashMap instance that will be modified and read by multiple threads I might define like this:

public class My Class {

    private volatile ConcurrentHashMap<String,String> myMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<String,String>();
...
}

adding final to the myMap field results in an error saying I can only use final or volatile. Why can it not be both?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T22:11:44+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 10:11 pm

    volatile only has relevance to modifications of the variable itself, not the object it refers to. It makes no sense to have a final volatile field because final fields cannot be modified. Just declare the field final and it should be fine.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class Manager that is going to be accessed by multiple threads
I have a class like the below and am wondering, will this be thread-safe
I have a class that looks like: class A { public: A(); void MethodThatWillNotBeInOtherStructure();
I have a public static class in which I would like to have a
I have a java class that is accessed by a lot of threads at
I have a collection of objects that is modified by one thread and read
I have this code : public void GenerateWtW() { ExecutorService exec = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(30); ConcurrentHashMap<String,
I would like to have my abstract parent class have a method that would
Is there a way to require that a class have a particular abstract member?
I have class method that returns a list of employees that I can iterate

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.