Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 834435
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T04:40:15+00:00 2026-05-15T04:40:15+00:00

If LinkedHashMap’s time complexity is same as HashMap’s complexity why do we need HashMap?

  • 0

If LinkedHashMap’s time complexity is same as HashMap’s complexity why do we need HashMap? What are all the extra overhead LinkedHashMap has when compared to HashMap in Java?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T04:40:16+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:40 am

    LinkedHashMap will take more memory. Each entry in a normal HashMap just has the key and the value. Each LinkedHashMap entry has those references and references to the next and previous entries. There’s also a little bit more housekeeping to do, although that’s usually irrelevant.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 496k
  • Answers 496k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer add() doesn't appear to depend on any template parameters (it's… May 16, 2026 at 11:36 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Apparently the idea that truncate can't be rolled back is… May 16, 2026 at 11:36 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First, are you timing just this method call? Where do… May 16, 2026 at 11:36 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I have read that LinkedHashMap has faster iteration speed than HashMap because its elements
LinkedHashMap is the Java implementation of a Hashtable like data structure (dict in Python)
I have java.util.LinkedHashMap with Integer as Key and Character as Value. I know the
I know LinkedHashMap has a predictable iteration order (insertion order). Does the Set returned
I am reading the Java Hashmap documentation but I don't understand this sentence. Note
I have a LinkedHashMap<String,Object> and was wondering what the most efficient way to put
I am using a linkedHashMap to guarantee order when someone tries to access it.
I have used LinkedHashMap because it is important the order in which keys entered
I want to create a LinkedHashMap which will limit its size based on available
So i want to pass a LinkedHashMap to an intent. //SEND THE MAP Intent

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.