Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6328261
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T17:25:40+00:00 2026-05-24T17:25:40+00:00

If Multiple exceptions are allowed in catch() then it will reduce amount of redundant

  • 0

If Multiple exceptions are allowed in catch() then it will reduce amount of redundant error handling code.
for example,

try{
// some statments 
}
catch(Type1Exception t1, Type2Exception t2, Type3Exception t3) {   // wish if this could be allowed
/* t1, t2, t3 are children of Exception and needs same error handling then why to have different catch blocks with same piece of code */
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T17:25:41+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 5:25 pm

    Yes – that’s why it’s supported in Java 7.

    So your example would actually be:

    try {
    } catch (Type1Exception | Type2Exception | Type3Exception ex) {
       ...
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Should I put multiple statements in a try and then catch all possible exceptions,
I have some code that needs to rescue multiple types of exceptions in ruby:
In designing class with multiple/nested has-a relationships, who should catch exceptions? I guess this
Possible Duplicate: Catch multiple Exceptions at once? Is there any way in C# to
I'm trying to use exceptions in PHP as a way of avoiding multiple if-then-else
When throwing exceptions between multiple methods, should all methods re-throw the exception? for example
I'm developing some lower end code in my system that uses multiple child classes
Duplicate: How to catch exceptions from a ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem? I am queueing up multiple delegates
Is it possible to test for multiple exceptions in a single JUnit unit test?
Using C#, is there a better way to handle multiple types of exceptions rather

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.