Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
If my reading of Mike Ash’s “Zeroing Weak References” writeup is correct, weak references are like assign references without ARC. However, if the referenced object is deallocated, instead of getting a “dangling pointer” (meaning a pointer that points to a deallocated object), the pointer gets set to nil.
Is this right, and does this happen with any property marked weak or assign (when ARC is active)?
If this is correct, this would eliminate a lot of SIGABRTs.
It’s mostly right, but
assignproperties are still treated the same as they ever were, onlyweakones are zeroing. Another caveat is that zeroing weak references are only available in Mac OS X ≥ 10.7 and iOS ≥ 5. While the rest of ARC was backported to 10.6 and iOS 4, weak references cannot be used at all on these OS’s.