Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1000831
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:34:29+00:00 2026-05-16T07:34:29+00:00

If one of relational databases paradigms is to be tuple oriented we have the

  • 0

If one of relational databases paradigms is to be tuple oriented we have the biggest limitation here.

If one could design column oriented db, that would improve performance a lot.
Vector operations would perform out of the box, indexing, hashing for simple symbol columns lookups, linked lists behind the scenes as engine.

Memory mapping: dumps in huge chunks in microseconds as well as loading those disk images.
And still have use well understood and standard language (SQL) that multiple vendors support.
Imagine how many tools could be designed for interfacing that thing, because of its simplicity.
Wouldn’t it be more robust (and KISS at the same time)?

UPDATE
Thanks to all contributors.
Question has been unjustly closed, though i’ve found your all answers very informative.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:34:30+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:34 am

    Are all modern RDBMS row oriented?

    No. They’re designed for specific tasks, say OLTP vs OLAP. Even the popular ones like MySQL have column-store engines (ex: Infobright). And there are DBMS’s that are built as a column-oriented DB from the ground up as well.

    Here’s a potentially interesting read for you: C-Store: A Column-oriented DBMS (PDF format)

    LucidDB is a popular column-oriented database for data warehousing and BI:

    LucidDB is the first and only
    open-source RDBMS purpose-built
    entirely for data warehousing and
    business intelligence. It is based on
    architectural cornerstones such as column-store, bitmap indexing, hash
    join/aggregation, and page-level
    multiversioning.
    Most database
    systems (both proprietary and
    open-source) start life with a focus
    on transaction processing
    capabilities, then get analytical
    capabilities bolted on as an
    afterthought (if at all). By contrast,
    every component of LucidDB was
    designed with the requirements of
    flexible, high-performance data
    integration and sophisticated query
    processing in mind.
    Moreover,
    comprehensiveness within the focused
    scope of its architecture means
    simplicity for the user: no DBA
    required.

    See its list of features for those that overlap with your interests here: LucidDB Features

    And still have use well understood and
    standard language (SQL) that multiple
    vendors support.

    You can use SQL with LucidDB.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm interested in hearing about design strategies you have used with non-relational nosql databases
I have 2 tables that their rows have one on one relation.. For you
i have an entity Entity1 that have one to many relation with Entity2 as
One thing I have in mind is, that datasets in Core Data (or lets
I have no experience with relational databases and before I write C++ code to
I have an embarrassing question regarding Access. I can build relational databases in my
I have a group of related companies that share items they own with one-another.
Does anyone have any good scenarios for teaching relational databases and SQL? All the
I have a question on best practice for relational databases and hierarchies. My question
Does anyone know of papers/books/etc. that document patterns for databases? For example, one common

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.