Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7405323
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T05:23:12+00:00 2026-05-29T05:23:12+00:00

If several instances of the same code are running on different servers, I would

  • 0

If several instances of the same code are running on different servers, I would like to use a database to make sure a process doesn’t start on one server if it’s already running on another server.

I could probably come-up with some workable SQL commands that used Oracle transaction processing, latches, or whatever, but I’d rather find something that’s been tried and true.

Years ago a developer that was a SQL wiz had a single SQL transaction that took the semaphore and returned true if it got it, and returned false if it didn’t get it. Then at the end of my processing, I’d need to run another SQL transaction to release the semaphore. It would be cool, but I don’t know if it’s possible for a database-supported semaphore to have a time-out. That would be a huge bonus to have a timeout!

EDIT:

Here are what might be some workable SQL commands, but no timeout except through a cron job hack:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
--Setup
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE TABLE "JOB_LOCKER" ( "JOB_NAME" VARCHAR2(128 BYTE), "LOCKED" VARCHAR2(1 BYTE), "UPDATE_TIME" TIMESTAMP (6) );
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "JOB_LOCKER_PK" ON "JOB_LOCKER" ("JOB_NAME") ;
ALTER TABLE "JOB_LOCKER" ADD CONSTRAINT "JOB_LOCKER_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("JOB_NAME");
ALTER TABLE "JOB_LOCKER" MODIFY ("JOB_NAME" NOT NULL ENABLE);
ALTER TABLE "JOB_LOCKER" MODIFY ("LOCKED" NOT NULL ENABLE);

insert into job_locker (job_name, locked) values ('myjob','N');
commit;

---------------------------------------------------------------------
--Execute at the beginning of the job
--AUTOCOMMIT MUST BE OFF!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
select * from job_locker where job_name='myjob' and locked = 'N' for update NOWAIT;
--returns one record if it's ok. Otherwise returns ORA-00054.  Any other thread attempting to get the record gets ORA-00054.
update job_locker set locked = 'Y', update_time = sysdate where job_name = 'myjob';
--1 rows updated. Any other thread attempting to get the record gets ORA-00054.
commit;
--Any other thread attempting to get the record with locked = 'N' gets zero results.
--You could have code to pull for that job name and locked = 'Y' and if still zero results, add the record.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
--Execute at the end of the job
---------------------------------------------------------------------
update job_locker set locked = 'N', update_time = sysdate where job_name = 'myjob';
--Any other thread attempting to get the record with locked = 'N' gets no results.
commit;
--One record returned to any other thread attempting to get the record with locked = 'N'.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
--If the above 'end of the job' fails to run (system crash, etc)
--The 'locked' entry would need to be changed from 'Y' to 'N' manually
--You could have a periodic job to look for old timestamps and locked='Y'
--to clear those.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T05:23:13+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 5:23 am

    You should look into DBMS_LOCK. Essentially, it allows for the enqueue locking mechanisms that Oracle uses internally, except that it allows you to define a lock type of ‘UL’ (user lock). Locks can be held shared or exclusive, and a request to take a lock, or to convert a lock from one mode to another, support a timeout.

    I think it will do what you want.

    Hope that helps.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've come across several instances of C# code like the following: public static int
I'm using MEF to create several instances of the same export. I'd like to
I would like to store instances of several classes in a vector. Since all
Say I have a .mat file with several instances of the same structure, each
I've been using the same bit of code for several versions of my app
I'm finding myself in need of combining several instances of the same type. This
I am using several instances of the same custom component on the same SWF.
I would like to have a unique sort function for several associative arrays. The
I have several instances where that a section of legacy sql statements is based
There is need for quering NHibernate for several instances of the entity. I've tried

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.