If so, how?
If not, what is the best workaround? Particularly, I’m trying to automate running unit tests in the GUI test runner on arbitrary developers’ machines.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
If so, how?
If not, what is the best workaround? Particularly, I’m trying to automate running unit tests in the GUI test runner on arbitrary developers’ machines.
The best solution is to make the classes you want to unit test accept configuration settings in their constructors rather than read them from configuration files.
Make callers responsible for obtaining configuration data: decouple your classes from specific configuration sources and eliminate hidden dependencies in one fell swoop.