Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
If there are multiple threads all waiting on the same lock is it possible to have the Main thread have higher priority in acquiring the lock. Meaning that if worker threads go to the lock statement before the main thread, the main thread would acquire the lock before the other threads that were already waiting on it.
No, the
lockstatement maps toSystem.Threading.Monitor.Enter()(MSDN) and there is no overload that accepts a priority parameter.The closest thing I can think of is a ReaderWriterLock(Slim) but I would seriously reconsider the design that leads to this request. There probably are better ways to achieve what you need.