Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6154591
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T20:17:21+00:00 2026-05-23T20:17:21+00:00

If there is a constructor like function a() {} then (new a) instanceof a

  • 0

If there is a constructor like

function a() {}

then

(new a) instanceof a === true

But on the other hand,

function a() { return {} }

results in

(new a) instanceof a === false

So what I was thinking is that

function a() { return 123 }

would result in the same thing. However, when returning a Number,

(new a) instanceof a === true

How is this possible? Why can’t I make a constructor return something else than an Object?

(I do know making a constructor returning a Number is rather useless but I would like to understand the ‘why’ of this behaviour)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T20:17:22+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 8:17 pm

    According to the spec: If calling the constructor returns an object, then this object is the result of the new-expression. If the constructor doesn’t return an object (but undefined or some other primitive value), the result is the newly created object.

    If primitives were allowed, then all constructors would have to explicitly return something (typically “this“), otherwise the result would be undefined (because the result of a function without a return is undefined). That would be a needless hassle.

    Additionally, it makes sense that new can be relied on to always return an object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to have some kind of default constructor (like a C++
Are there any memory leaks when I throw an exception from a constructor like
StructureMap doesn't like passing in Nullable types as constructor arguments. Is there a reason
Example: I have a class called ParentClass. ParentClass has a constructor like this: function
In jQuery there is $.extend() function. That basically works like matching default settings with
Is there some rare language construct I haven't encountered (like the few I've learned
In .NET, there is a constructor for Dictionary<TKey, TValue> that takes one parameter, int
Is there any sense to declare default constructor in Java? class MyClass { public
Is there difference in behavior between a constructor call and a procedure call in
Is there any way to make private variables (those defined in the constructor), available

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.