Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 821335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T02:37:25+00:00 2026-05-15T02:37:25+00:00

if we have to implementations of string split for j2me, one returns vector and

  • 0

if we have to implementations of string split for j2me, one returns vector and the other returns array , in terms of performance on hand held devices which one is the best choice ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T02:37:26+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:37 am

    Arrays would always perform better than Vector, although the difference should not be too significant. The real question is whether this performance is worth the sacrifice of not having the rich functionalities provided by Vector, e.g. being dynamically growable, etc.

    Generally speaking you should always prefer List to arrays (see Effective Java 2nd Edition, Item 25, Prefer lists to arrays), but J2ME development may not give you the luxury.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a couple of custom DialogPreference implementations floating around, such as this one
We have an interface IPoller for which we have various implementations. We have a
I have a fairly simple set of functionality for which I have multiple implementations,
I've started working on a little ruby project that will have sample implementations of
I'm developing a framework application, and I want individual implementations to have the possibility
I have two total different implementations of AsyncTask , lets say AT1 and AT2
I have configured a set of interface implementations with EntLib. unity block. The constructor
I have the task of creating implementations for a large number of metric data
I have come across many ad hoc implementations of thread class in C++, but
I have seen a lot of shared hashmap implementations. Here is the specific scenario

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.