Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 423345
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T19:10:16+00:00 2026-05-12T19:10:16+00:00

If you compile a shared library with GCC and pass the -z defs flag

  • 0

If you compile a shared library with GCC and pass the “-z defs” flag (which I think just gets passed blindly on to ld) then you get a nice report of what symbols are not defined, and ld fails (no .so file is created). On the other hand, if you don’t specify “-z defs” or explicitly specify “-z nodefs” (the default), then a .so will be produced even if symbols are missing, but you get no report of what symbols were missing if any.

I’d like both! I want the .so to be created, but I’d also like any missing symbols to be reported. The only way I know of to do this so far is to run it twice, once with “-z defs” and once without. This means the potentially long linking stage is done twice though, which will make the compile/test cycle even worse.

In case you’re wondering my ultimate goal — when compiling a library, undefined symbols in a local object file indicates a dependency wasn’t specified that should have been in my build environment, whereas if a symbol is missing in a library that you’re linking against that’s not an error (-l flags are only given for immediate dependencies, not dependencies of dependencies, under this system). I need the report for the part where it lists “referenced in file” so I can see whether the symbol was referenced by a local object or a library being linked. The –allow-shlib-undefined option almost fixes this but it doesn’t work when linking against static libraries.

Preference to solutions that will work with both the GNU and Solaris linkers.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T19:10:16+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:10 pm

    From the GNU ld 2.15 NEWS file:

    • Improved linker’s handling of unresolved symbols. The switch
      –unresolved-symbols= has been added to tell the linker when it
      should report them and the switch –warn-unresolved-symbols has been added to
      make reports be issued as warning messages rather than errors.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm in the process of porting some code from Linux to Mac OS X.
I'm trying to build a C++ extension for python using swig. I've followed the
Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
I'm trying to write test harness for part of my Android mapping application. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.