Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6578735
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T15:48:31+00:00 2026-05-25T15:48:31+00:00

If you have a table with 20 rows that contains 12 null columns and

  • 0

If you have a table with 20 rows that contains 12 null columns and 8 columns with values, what is the implications for storage and memory usage?

Is null unique or is it stored in memory at the same location each time and just referenced? Do a ton of nulls take up a ton of space? Does a table full of nulls take up the same amount of space as a table the same size full of int values?

This is for Sql server.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T15:48:32+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 3:48 pm

    This depends on database engine as well as column type.

    At least SQLite stores each null column as a “null type” which takes up NO additional space (each record is serialized to a single blob for storage so there is no space reserved for a non-null value in this case). With optimizations like this a NULL value has very little overhead to store. (SQLite also has optimizations for the values 0 and 1 — the designers of databases aren’t playing about!) See 2.1 Record Format for the details.

    Now, things can get much more complex, especially with updating and potential index fragmentation. For instance, in SQL Server space may be reserved for the column data, depending upon the type. For instance, a int null will still reserve space for the integer (as well as have an “is null” flag somewhere), however varchar(100) null doesn’t seem to reserve the space (this last bit is from memory, so be warned!).

    Happy coding.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a table that contains maybe 10k to 100k rows and I need
I have a table T (structure below) which initially contains all-NULL values in an
I have a MySQL table that contains many rows. The table structure is as
I have 2 tables. Table Accs contains 9 million rows (3 columns: acc_id, month,
I have a column which contains null values in some of the rows. I
I have two functions to add and remove table rows that contain a form
On my pages I have a table with rows that typically look like this:
I have a MySQL table with about 5,000,000 rows that are being constantly updated
I have a table that looks like that: The rows are sorted by CLNDR_DATE
I have a join which deletes rows that match another table but the joining

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.