Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3610294
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T21:44:03+00:00 2026-05-18T21:44:03+00:00

I’ll be the first person to tell someone that my code design could use

  • 0

I’ll be the first person to tell someone that my code design could use improvement. I can’t help but feel that when I have typecasts in my code that its a sign that something needs to be redesigned to remove the typecasts. This question sort of has two parts to it, the first being simply the one posted: Are typecasts a sign of poorly designed code?

The second question is based on the first, if typecasts are as evil as I feel they are, then how could the below situation be avoided?

class InputPanel : Control
{
  public event EventHandler InputEvent;
}

class OutputPanel : Control
{
}

class MainWindow : Form
{
  public MainWindow()
  {
    var loadButton = new Button();
    loadButton.Click += new EventHandler(HandleButtonClick);

    var inputPanel = new InputPanel();
    inputPanel.InputEvent += new EventHandler(HandleInputEvent);
    bodyControl = inputPanel;
  }

  private void HandleButtonClick(object sender, EventArgs args)
  {
    OpenFileDialog dialog = new OpenFileDialog();
    if (dialog.ShowDialog(this) == DialogResult.OK)
    {
      var data = LoadDataFromFile(dialog.FileName);
      var inputPanel = bodyControl as InputPanel; // Ugly typecast...
      if (inputPanel != null)
      {
        inputPanel.PopulateFromData(data);
      }
    }
  }

  private void HandleInputEvent(object sender, EventArgs args) 
  {
    var outputPanel = new OutputPanel();
    bodyControl = outputPanel;
  }

  Control BodyControl;
}

The reasoning behind the above code is that the MainWindow form contains a MenuStrip (simplified to a button in this example) and a single control (the BodyControl). As the displayed control needs to be changed from the input panel to the output panel, via the button click, you can simply reassign the BodyControl field (adjust parents and such). This means only one panel is loaded at a time, layout logic becomes simplified because there is only one panel to position within the MainWindow (two if you include the MenuStrip) as opposed to conditionally laying out multiply ‘body’ controls based on which state the program is in (input vs. output).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T21:44:04+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:44 pm

    You can make your code much cleaner (and avoid the typecast) by using an interface or a common base class for the two controls (inputPanel and outputPanel). Simply store BodyControl as the base class or interface (instead of Control). Assuming the interface or base class implements the PopulateFromData method, you wouldn’t need the cast at all.

    Also be sure you’re aware of the where clause in C#. It can come in handy when dealing with similar scenarios.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
i got an object with contents of html markup in it, for example: string
I'm looking for suggestions for debugging... If you view this site in Firefox or
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.