Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6896617
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T07:03:57+00:00 2026-05-27T07:03:57+00:00

I’m a little new to JavaScript. I’ve used it here and there on the

  • 0

I’m a little new to JavaScript. I’ve used it here and there on the client-side for a while, but now I am adventuring into server-side Javascript. This question is about Javascript objects, regarding their creation and the efficient definition of their properties.

I’ve seen (several times) that creating an object as var o = {}; is now preferred over var o = new Object(); for performance reasons. Are there differences in performance in how you add properties to an object?

For instance, is there any difference in performance between this situation:

var o = {
  thing1: "yardigooven",
  thing2: "goovenyardi",
};

and this situation?:

var o = {};
o.thing1 = "yardigooven";
o.thing2 = "goovenyardi";

I’m assuming the first case is preferred, but I want to make sure before I write all of my object definitions that way.

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T07:03:58+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 7:03 am

    First of all, var o = {}; and var o = new Array(); aren’t the same. The first initializes an object, the second an array. var o = {}; and var o = new Object(); are equivalent.

    Now about the performance of using an object literal instead of adding the properties after. Which one is fastest? The answer is, we don’t care, and you shouldn’t either. If there is a difference in performance, it will be so small that it will never impact, even if you create 1 million objects at once, which is unlikely to ever happen.

    This is called premature-optimization, and is the bane of many intermediate programmers. Don’t worry about optimizing anything unless you start having performance problems. Then you use a profiler to detect where the bottleneck is and solve it. Just worry about making your app.

    For completeness’ sake, here is a test I ran on jsperf. In my browser, Chrome 15, the object literal initialization was 53% faster. Wow, 53%, that’s huge right? Except if you put your mouse over the tooltip for the test that uses properties after initialization, you’ll see it says something like

    Ran 681,285 times in 0.077 seconds.

    Your numbers may differ, but you’ll be able to observe that the method considered slowest still goes pretty fast by any standards. I think it’s safe to say that both are fast enough for any purpose. Just use the one you prefer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.