I’m adapting an XSLT from a third party which transforms an arbitrary number of XMLs into a single HTML document. It’s a pretty complex script and it will be revised in the future, so I’m trying to do a minimal adaptation in order to get it to work for our needs.
The following is a stripped down version of the XSLT (containing the essentials):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<xsl:output method="text" encoding="UTF-8" omit-xml-declaration="yes"/>
<xsl:param name="files" select="document('files.xml')//File"/>
<xsl:param name="root" select="document($files)"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:for-each select="$root/RootNode">
<xsl:apply-templates select="."/>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="RootNode">
<xsl:for-each select="//Node">
<xsl:text>Node: </xsl:text><xsl:value-of select="."/><xsl:text>, </xsl:text>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Now files.xml contains a list of all the URLs of the files to be included (in this case the local files file1.xml and file2.xml). Because we want to read XMLs from memory rather than from disk, and because the invocation of the XSLT only allows for a single XML source, I have combined the two files in a single XML document. The following is a combination of two files (there may be more in a real situation)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TempNode>
<RootNode>
<Node>1</Node>
<Node>2</Node>
</RootNode>
<RootNode>
<Node>3</Node>
<Node>4</Node>
</RootNode>
</TempNode>
where the first RootNode originally resided in file1.xml and the second in file2.xml.
Due to the complexity of the actual XSLT, I’ve figured that my best shot is to try to alter the $root-param. I’ve tried the following:
<xsl:param name="root" select="/TempNode"/>
The problem is this. In the case of <xsl:param name="root" select="document($files)"/>, the XPath expression "//Node" in <xsl:for-each select="//Node"> selects the Node’s from file1.xml and file2.xml independently, i.e. producing the following (desired) list:
Node: 1, Node: 2, Node: 3, Node: 4,
However, when I combine the content of the two files into a single XML and parse this (and use the suggested $root-definition), the expression "//Node" will select all Node’s that are children of the TempNode. (In other words, the desired list, as represented above, is produced twice due to the combination with the outer <xsl:for-each select="$root/RootNode"> loop.)
(A side note: as observed in comment a) in this page, document() apparently changes the root node, perhaps explaining this behavior.)
My question becomes:
How can I re-define $root, using the combined XML as source instead of a multi-source through document(), so that the list is only produced once, without touching the remainder of the XSLT? It’s like if $root defined using the document()-function, there is no common root node in the param. Is it possible to define a param with two “separate” node trees?
Btw: I’ve tried defining a document like this
<xsl:param name="root">
<xsl:for-each select="/TempNode/*">
<xsl:document>
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
</xsl:document>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:param>
thinking it might solve the problem, but the "//Node" expression still fetches all the Nodes. Is the context node in the <xsl:template match="RootNode">-template actually somewhere in the input document and not the param? (Honestly, I’m pretty confused when it comes to context nodes.)
Thanks in advance!
(Updated more)
OK, some of the problem is becoming clear. First, just to make sure I understand, you aren’t actually passing parameters for
$filesand$rootto the XSLT processor invocation, right? (They might as well be variables rather than params?)Now to the main issues… In XPath, when you evaluate an expression that begins with “/” (including “//”), the context node is ignored [mostly]. Therefore, when you have
the matched RootNode is ignored. Maybe you wanted
in which the for-each would select Node elements that are descendants of the matched RootNode? This would fix your problem of generating the desired node list twice.
I inserted [mostly] above because I recalled that an “absolute location path” starts from “the root node of the document containing the context node”. So the context node does affect what document is used for “//Node”. Maybe that’s what you intended all along? I guess I was slow to catch on to that.
Or more precisely,
document()doesn’t actually change anything, in the sense of side effects; rather, it returns a set of nodes contained (usually) by different documents than the primary source document. XSLT instructions likexsl:apply-templatesandxsl:for-eachestablish new values for the context node inside the scope of their template bodies. So if you usexsl:apply-templatesandxsl:for-eachwith select=”document(…)/…”, the context node inside the scope of those instructions will belong to an external document, so any use of “/…” as an XPath will start from that external document.Updated again
As @Alej hinted, it’s really not possible given the above constraint. If you’re selecting “//Node” in each iteration of the loop over “$root/RootNode”, then in order for each iteration not to select the same nodes as the other iterations, each value of “$root/RootNode” must be in a different document. Since you’re using the combined XML source, instead of a multi-source, this is not possible.
But if you don’t insist that your
<xsl:for-each select="//...">XPath expression cannot change, it becomes very easy. 🙂 Just put a “.” before the “//”.The value of the param is a node-set. All nodes in the set may be contained in the same document, or they may not, depending on whether the first argument to document() is a nodeset or just a single node.
I believe by “separate”, you mean “belonging to different documents”? Yes it is, but I don’t think you can do it in XSLT 1.0 unless you’re selecting nodes that belong to different documents in the first place.
You mentioned trying
but
<xsl:document>is not defined in XSLT 1.0, and your stylesheet says version=”1.0″. Do you have XSLT 2.0 available? If so, let us know and we can pursue this option. To be honest,<xsl:document>is not familiar territory for me. But I’m happy to learn along with you.