Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8783309
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T20:47:57+00:00 2026-06-13T20:47:57+00:00

I’m already iterating over several hashmaps each of sizes 20-40 items so would it

  • 0

I’m already iterating over several hashmaps each of sizes 20-40 items so would it make more sense to find an item just by adding an if condition while iterating or using a single get(key) operation ? Which approach would give more performance.

I know for accurate results I should rely on profiling results but since I’m not too familiar with profiling, wanted an expert opinion.

Edit:

Here is my code:

    for (HColumn col : lobColumns) {// lobcolumns is a list but I also have hashmap already built containing same elements as this list
        switch (ByteBufferToInt(col.getName())) {

            case .......:
                break;

            case .......:
                break;
            case .......:
                break;
            case .......:
                break;
            case .......:
                break;                  
        }            
        if (ByteBufferToInt(col.getName()).intValue()==currentUserId()){// here is what I'm using as replacement for hashmap `get()`
            .....
        } 
    }

lobcolumns is a list but I also have hashmap already built containing same elements as this list. This list/map contains a few constant & a few variable objects, for constants I use switch case for efficient lookups & for finding a single special variable item I need to need to decide whether to use hashmap get() or using if while already iterating.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T20:47:59+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 8:47 pm

    Well I mean let’s look at it. The get operation is O(1) or constant time with a perfect hash function in the worst case. Whereas iteration is O(n) in the worst case. If you have the key ahead of time just invoke get there is no need to iterate over everything.

    Update

    The following line:

    for (HColumn col : lobColumns)
    

    Your comment was that you have all of these values stored in a HashMap already. If the map is defined as so:

    Map<Integer, HColumn> columns = new HashMap<Integer,HColumn>();  
    

    The if statement moves outside of the for loop and becomes the following:

    HColumn column = columns.get(currentUserId());     
    if(null != column)  
    {  
         doSomethingWithColumn(column);  // this was the old if block
    }   
    for(Integer col : columns.keySet())  
    {  
        switch(col)  
        {  
           ...  
        }
    }
    

    This reduces the if to only be executed once, as it is now outside of the for loop.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
In my XML file chapters tag has more chapter tag.i need to display chapters
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
I would like my Web page http://www.gmarks.org/math_in_e-mail.txt on my Apache 2.2.14 server to display
Let's say I'm outputting a post title and in our database, it's Hello Y&#8217;all
I have a .ini file as follows: [playlist] numberofentries=2 File1=http://87.230.82.17:80 Title1=(#1 - 365/1400) Example

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.