Home/ Questions/Q 6109759
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-23T14:26:24+00:00

I’m an ASP.NET / C# developer. I use VS2010 all the time. I am

  • 0

I’m an ASP.NET / C# developer. I use VS2010 all the time. I am thinking of enabling BitLocker on my laptop to protect the contents, but I am concerned about performance degradation. Developers who use IDEs like Visual Studio are working on lots and lots of files at once. More than the usual office worker, I would think.

So I was curious if there are other developers out there who develop with BitLocker enabled. How has the performance been? Is it noticeable? If so, is it bad?

My laptop is a 2.53GHz Core 2 Duo with 4GB RAM and an Intel X25-M G2 SSD. It’s pretty snappy but I want it to stay that way. If I hear some bad stories about BitLocker, I’ll keep doing what I am doing now, which is keeping stuff RAR’ed with a password when I am not actively working on it, and then SDeleting it when I am done (but it’s such a pain).

2015 Update: I’ve been using Visual Studio 2015 on my Surface Pro 3 when I travel, which has BitLocker enabled by default. It feels pretty much like my desktop, which is an i7-2600k @ 4.6 GHz. I think on modern hardware with a good SSD, you won’t notice!

2021 Update: I have been enabling bitlocker on all my computers and it flies now. No worries. Get an NVMe SSD and don’t look back.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    With my T7300 2.0GHz and Kingston V100 64gb SSD the results are

    Bitlocker off → on

    Sequential read 243 MB/s → 140 MB/s

    Sequential write 74.5 MB/s → 51 MB/s

    Random read 176 MB/s → 100 MB/s

    Random write, and the 4KB speeds are almost identical.

    Clearly the processor is the bottleneck in this case. In real life usage however boot time is about the same, cold launch of Opera 11.5 with 79 tabs remained the same 4 seconds all tabs loaded from cache.

    A small build in VS2010 took 2 seconds in both situations. Larger build took 2 seconds vs 5 from before. These are ballpark because I’m looking at my watch hand.

    I guess it all depends on the combination of processor, ram, and ssd vs hdd. In my case the processor has no hardware AES so compilation is worst case scenario, needing cycles for both assembly and crypto.

    A newer system with Sandy Bridge would probably make better use of a Bitlocker enabled SDD in a development environment.

    Personally I’m keeping Bitlocker enabled despite the performance hit because I travel often. It took less than an hour to toggle Bitlocker on/off so maybe you could just turn it on when you are traveling then disable it afterwards.

    Thinkpad X61, Windows 7 SP1

    • 0